Letter to HMRC regarding pool car status
A pool car can be very tax efficient but in order to get one past HMRC you’ll need to meet some strict conditions. To avoid uncertainty, use this letter to obtain confirmation from HMRC that the terms on which the car is used make it a pool car.
No private use
Get a pool car past HMRC and you can secure some excellent tax savings - no taxable benefit on the driver, no fuel benefit charge and no employers’ NI. But to obtain this status, you’ll need to gather evidence together about the use of the pool car.
Strict conditions
The conditions that have to be met are: (1) it must be available to and actually used by more than one employee; (2) it must not be used by one employee to the exclusion of others; (3) it should not normally be kept overnight at an employee’s home; and (4) it must not be used for private journeys except as a small part of a business journey. Given that the rules provide a total exemption from any tax charge, it’s not surprising that HMRC applies them very strictly.
Confirmation
Use our Letter to HMRC Regarding Pool Car Status to work through what HMRC is after. Send it in with copies of the employees’ driving licences and the Pool Car Journey Record. The decision about whether the vehicle will be accepted as a pool car will normally be taken by HMRC (at inspector level), although an appeal may be made on the issue to the First-tier Tribunal.
Related Topics
-
Was a company buyback of EIS shares tax avoidance?
Two taxpayers used the “purchase of own shares” procedure to extract gains they’d made from enterprise investment scheme (EIS) shares. HMRC said this was unfair tax avoidance, the taxpayers disagreed. What did the Upper Tribunal decide?
-
HMRC’s new compliance check service
HMRC has published a collection of videos and notes to help if you’re picked for a compliance check. Is HMRC’s new service worth a look or is it just official propaganda?
-
Income sharing trouble for separated couple
After a couple separated one spouse received income from letting the property she jointly owned with her estranged spouse. HMRC taxed all the income on her. Was it right to do so or should her spouse have been taxed on half the income?